Thursday, April 24, 2008

IS IT JUST ME?

or, what is it about the universe that makes me want to involve myself with multiple pieces of it at once?

why is it that i don't want to leave this dimension to it's own devices?

curious.

-=T=-

Friday, September 09, 2005

UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT SHAKES REGION

quoting another site: "Besides Belarus, the Ukraine is a place where former Soviet nuclear weapons have disappeared. While Ukraine has helped NATO and the U.N. fight terrorism, the people of computer-savvy Ukraine have some problems with violent crime, economic crime, organized crime, and human trafficking for purposes of prostitution. Many criminal groups consider the port of Odessa an advantageous route to transport drugs and contraband. A good deal of drugs come from neighboring Moldova. Experts say Ukrainian organized crime is stronger than Russian organized crime."

(from : http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/areas/europe.htm )

Ukraine Special Weapons

After the disintegration of the USSR, Ukraine found itself in possession of the world's third largest nuclear arsenal. There were 176 launchers of intercontinental ballistic missiles with some 1,240 warheads on Ukrainian territory. This force consisted of 130 SS-19s, each capable of delivering six nuclear weapons, and 46 SS-24s, each armed with ten nuclear weapons. An additional 14 SS-24 missiles were present in Ukraine, but not operationally deployed with warheads. Several dozen bombers with strategic nuclear capabilities were armed with some 600 air-launched missiles, along with gravity bombs. In addition, as many as 3,000 tactical nuclear weapons rounded out an arsenal totalling approximately 5,000 strategic and tactical weapons.

(from : http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/ukraine/
)

Ukraine Admits Missile Transfers - Paul Kerr

Ukrainian officials have acknowledged that a total of 12 Kh-55 medium-range, air-launched cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads were transferred from Ukraine to Iran and China in the last five years.

(from : http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005_05/Ukraine.asp )

Kh55 cruise missile, thermonuclear warhead

Soviet Nukes Missing - Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com (Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2002)

"Out of 2,400 nuclear warheads which were on Ukrainian territory, the withdrawal of only 2,200 warheads has been verified. The fate of the remaining 200 warheads is unknown," Simonenko told Pravda.ru.

( from : http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/9/17/155150.shtml )

This act of firing his two best supporters, (the strong Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko and her rival Petro Poroshenko ), seems to be an act of evening the odds, since they could not work together. Honestly, it's like iving them a think-time. These two can't stay out of politics. I really expect Tymoshenko to rise early as an opponent to President Yushchenko, as she might have been stagnating on his coat-tails. Poroshenko has pledged his loyalty to Yushchenko, and, they are family.

Yushchenko won't last long without Poroshenko's financial backing. (Plus, Poroshenko has too much invested to admit it's not going to yield gains.) This represents a move of Yushchenko towards the middle, having committed himself to those most accused of corruption. But, this is also a consolidation, the type of isolation that either leads to a strong, lasting, centralized govenment, or collapse, riot, and revolution.

If Poroshenko doesn't re-emerge soon, along with his well funded friends on the Special council just dissolved, then Yushchenko will expect to resign by the end of winter.

As for the rest of the now unemployed government, they are corrupt, so they'll take whatever they can get. This is a power grab, by both sides, or a means for Yushchenko to give in to pressure and resign in failure, should he find himself without a corner to turn to. Nor will quarter be offerred, excepting that if the two factions gain a common ground. This won't happen without Yushchenko, so odds are rising from "desparate" to "possible" for him.

How does the U.S. make this happen? We aren't likely to make any move other than overtures towards peace. (We might be able to buy out Poroshenko, forcing Yushchenko to play ball with Tymoshenko.)

speculation...

-=T=-

Ukrainian National Anthem

Thursday, September 08, 2005

DID KATRINA WIN?

It's a storm. A freak storm. Some said, "I saw it coming, and I said it was going to be bad." Nobody disputed this. Yet, they also didn't say how bad it would be. Not until it was too late.

And when it's too late, bad things result. So, people are REQUIRED to shift blame, here and there, whereever it can be passed on. The Mayor says this, while the Fema director says that, and the President says this, while the Governor says that.

In the middle of all this, two entities are smiling, watching the mud fly. The media and Katrina herself. (We'll say she is a person just for the sake of acknowledging her political power in all this.) The media is the conduit for public displays of self-admonishment and theatrical mis-combubery, gratfully lavishing heaps of responsibility on the next likely being, whether up, down, or across the chain. But, the media, for all it's puppy dog eyed innocence, has nothing more to say than, "Oh, the humanity, the travesty! Who are we to crucify?" Honestly, sitting in the background, behind the cameras, are news-war-rooms, strategically positioning the latest horrible discovery....

...30 found dead at a nurse home...

...mayor estimates 10,000 dead...

...many survivors did not have homes insured...

...shots fired at police, killing 2, while two others committed suicide...

Damn, that's got to get your attention. And it is money to them. The Media doesn't do this for charity. It's not in the habit of making Public Service Announcements. The high stakes that drive the Media is the same dollar you donated to the Red Cross, only, it's airtime, bought by commercial advertisers to sell you and everyone else glued to the latest and greatest crisis all the things we can, will, and frequently purchase. Diapers, cars, diet food (?), marketted special events, new phones with cameras and little windows for reading email.

And we eat it up like candy. I mentioned on someone else's livejournal when she came to realize that it's not helping that it's all we see, that it's like we are revelling if not dwelling on someone else's misery. Katrina brought the blighted south a satellite away from us, and we were glued to the number of deaths from the Persian Wars to not take stock that these people in the gulf states and port cities were going to die come the first big storm.

That's political power. And it's something magical. Like a street card busker, hustling the kids, knowing he can show them the wrong card to pick, it redirects attention to where the next choice will draw them in again, and again, and again.

So, buy into it if you want to. I'm not going to stop you. I can't, being just the wayward opinion I am. But, if this rings in your ears a little bit, listen to this... Pay attention! Don't watch the news, over and over, like some zombie cow chewing on the misfortunate cud of the world. Determine what's worth watching, and what you're missing. There are horror stories out there on the little stations, about low income housing being rennovated for high income apartments, about government graft, about electrical power brokers getting off in court and making high wage positions in power regulation governing.

If we fail to notice these new disasters in the making, like we noticed how badly prepared New Orleans was, and how badly managed the evacuation was, then we are begging for more news to dwell on. Bad news. And, if that's the case, we might as well make it a conspiracy between the powers of the presiding heads of state, the media, and us, the viewing public that directs what notice should be made. If we give up the reigns to Our one remaining political horse, the command over the media which in turn commands the reaction of the government, then we are as guilty of every disaster we failed to prevent as those in power we are asked to blame.

To think, if the locals would have known beforehand they would lose New Orleans because of a levee deficiency, what would they have done? Strengthened it. That would have given evactuators more time to go in and rip people out of ther homes. As it was, the streets weren't safe for National Gaurd troops, much less granny stuck in her wheelchair.

Well, someone knew. They did drills predicting that the levee would break, and predicted 20% would stay, just as both did happen. From this intelligence gathering, nothing effective was done.
Why? I think you know.

And, thus, Katrina, to some measure, has won.

-=T=-

Tuesday, September 06, 2005

PERSIAN WARS

there is no way in hell i'm going to say that the persian wars are in any way productive. no matter what i really think. it's just a way of drawing potshots and raising the ire of those who are already pissed off about what they've lost in the wars, albeit lives, jobs, or property.

the problem with this type of self-consoring is that it just removes the mouth who finds reason in it from a more familiar, close-knit discussion table. it divides people who would otherwise be able to see better eye to eye, and lets the silent keep their opinions unchecked, with rapid growth ro rabid length en exhausted probability before long.

so, why speak? well, to keep those unlike paths of thought within range of each other. but, why not speak? again, the real probability that while stirring up the bees' nest one might suck down the queen.

so, to this end, and to keep the discussion civil, i'll offer this olive branch.

I see the good in the wars. I can't focus on it for the fog, the stink, and the detestible truth that lives are being spent seemingly cheaply in achievement of a definite end, but i will not ignore the fact that there is a greater purpose that we are committed to.

I won't deny both sides of this coin.

-=T=-